The Whore Enthroned

goddess-of-reason2-002

The excesses of the French Revolution strangely mirror our present predicament in both their ferocity and perversion. While we often cite the period as marking the beginning of the decline, the start of a truly tangible Kali Yuga, it is not as if this path has been smooth, beginning with minor infractions and accelerating to the present day. Far from it. The horrors of the revolution itself showed every bit of man’s grisly nature just as clearly as the meandering lunacies of our dear contemporary Progressive. As a reminder:

“There the dead were dragged out of their tombs with shouts, with laughter, with infernal pranks, which no people but the French could have committed, and which no writer of any other nation can describe. The best and the worst of their kings were exposed to equal indignities. No distinction was made as to sex, or virtue, or valour, or even military fame: if the embalmed remains or the mouldering bones were those of an aristocrat, they were cast forth, kicked about, or handled and examined, and exhibited with an apish curiosity scarcely less disgusting than the tiger ferocity, that other element of the national character.”

Man reverts to beast, he becomes the ape science has told him that he is, and kicks the bones of great men between his unwashed feet. Meanwhile, in the cathedral at Notre-Dame, Pierre Gaspard Chaumette, the sadistic and sexually perverted son of a shoemaker, organized the ultimate profanity against all things holy, desecrating the church and enthroning upon its altar a half-naked whore. This happened to the delight of the public who pledged their undying fealty to the goddesses Reason & Liberty, to this prostitute.

Chaumette was executed by guillotine in 1794, deemed too radical by his comrades, and the Cult of Reason proved to be a short-lived fad. But a question remains as to why a titillating symbol of liberated female sexuality was so intricately tied into the ideas of the revolution itself, and why did men empower such a symbol, rather than say a butcher, symbolic of their own sadism? Unpicking the meta-structure to femininity and how man interacts with this structure is critical for understanding contemporary politics surrounding sexuality.

Coincidentally enough, femininity has been on the study agenda recently. As part of an ongoing series of discussions related to Dante, which I will draw attention to when they are finished as a complete set, the Holy Theotokos has been under consideration. What is her symbolism, and what does her femininity teach us about the state of contemporary woman?

In Orthodox iconography, the Virgin Mary is depicted with three stars adorning her shawl. They symbolize her virginity prior to the birth, after the birth, and into eternity. Her chastity before God is a symbol of devotion, and carries with it a different significance than the chastity of monks. For monks, chastity is a particular ascetic pursuit designed to insulate one from corrupting influences and clear the darkened mind for the purposes of the highest personal theosis. For the Theotokos, virginity is a mark of devotion entirely devoid of a personal element, a renunciation of the world of personal pleasure and instinct in order to submit oneself into a greater whole. Not to conquer the inferior within, but to submit to the superior without. This is but the female path of salvation, the former being the male path. They are the lunar and solar sides of the same coin.

icon mary

Mary is a figure of great historical and theological significance, but most women are not. In lieu of submitting themselves directly to the Divine element, women submit themselves to a husband to whom they are bound for life. Famously in India, when a man’s life expired, his widow would jump onto his funeral pyre, following her purpose and center of attention into the beyond. The moon cannot be without the sun, for it produces no light of its own. Without the sun, it lives in darkness, ceasing to exist fully in Schrödinger’s sense of superposition: ‘what cannot be seen cannot be known to be in a certain state.’

We have made clear on numerous occasions that the male and female spirit are bifurcated along lines of virtue. For the man, the virtues of the warrior and the priest. For the woman, the virtues of the lover and the mother. Notice that all four of these virtues has a black mirror, an inversion that represents its nadir. For the man, the evils of the coward and the hedonist. For the woman, the evils of the adulterer and the child-killer. These represent the explicit rejections of the virtues attainable to men and women.

It is worth noting that as with the virtues, the vices for men are independent of the opposite sex, while the vices for women are dependent on the opposite sex. A man can be a hedonist when he seeks endless pleasure in food, drink, drugs, gluttony, violence, or any number of activities that do not require women, even while sexual vices are common. A woman however cannot commit adultery except with a man (lesbianism is not considered to be real sexuality in this context). Similarly, the man can demonstrably be a coward independent of women, when he is on the battlefield, even while submission to his wife is a form of cowardice. A woman however, cannot kill her child unless she is given that child by a man.

If you’ve ever wondered why religions tend to speak more harshly about the adultery of women, this is the reason. Not ‘sexism’ of the infantile kind that is proposed by scholars today, but an understanding of how nakedly evil adultery is in women. The significance of being a child-killer is also underlined by the fact that while murders in general are usually committed by men, the one subset of murders in which women routinely supersede men, is the murder of children in the primary years of care (this does not factor in abortion).

caseyCasey Anthony smiles with glee
as she gets away with murder

Civilization exists to punish cowards, hedonists, adulterers, and child-killers. If these necrotic influences are unchained, they corrupt the hearts of men and speed society to its quick destruction. The numeric account of the death of civilizations is wholly inadequate, for it is quality which has reign over quantity in every sphere that is not the perverted mind of the Modern. Men are in every case the lawgivers and prime movers of society. Due to dependence, they not only decide upon the restraints of their vices, but upon those of womankind as well.

Sex is dangerous, in that it brings new moral agents into the world that then have to be dealt with using the care we ascribe to moral agents, and do not ascribe to animals and inanimate objects. This prospect of risky addition has led to the development of highly sophisticated social systems which regulate sexual behavior within populations. The hard laws of human biology entail that human children have to be raised, they have to be protected, guided, taught. You cannot simply drop them out and expect things to turn out fine. Children need stable families to nurture their potential to its full expression.

Today, figures ostensibly of ‘the Right’, have convinced themselves that quantity does not arise from quality, and instead the reverse is the case, and thus they are enamored by the notion that they can win the great war of numbers with their racial foes. One could of course laugh at the fact that this ‘war’ (it’s a travesty to give it such a title for how pathetic it is) has been ongoing since the inception of legalized abortion across the Occidental world beginning in the last century, and has utterly failed to yield the results they desire. However, this would miss the most important point.

Support for abortion is de facto support for the sexual freedom of women. There is no getting around this point, for when a child is killed, the mother is free from the responsibility of having to actually be a mother. Regardless of her reasoning, the result is that her sexual activities pass without consequence. The hypocrisy of the modern ‘pro-life’ movement is that it opposes abortion while being completely unwilling to make any statement regarding sexual freedom. What asinine theater it was when President Donald Trump in a moment of blundering revealed this hypocrisy after proposing punishments not only for abortion doctors, but for the women who pay their contracts, only to be denounced by every ‘pro-life’ leader in the United States.

That’s another essay in itself, but as a principle, abortion is about liberation from biology. It always was. “BUT!” cries the so-called ‘far right extremist’, “What about the children being born into broken families, who statistics show invariably grow to become drains on society!” I turn the question around and ask “What about the children being conceived by so many of these irresponsible degenerates? And who has enabled them in their current state?”

firingsquadsnope, definitely can’t put an end to this

Oh, no! Do not dare question the sexual freedom of women. Do not dare question the behavior of whores who can be found panting and exhausted under a different man every weekend, be they white, yellow, black, or red! After all, it’s HER body, and how dare you violate her imaginary right to its sovereignty, established under no authority but her own.

The woman who murders her child is evil, rejecting motherhood entirely. But the men who support her engage in their own profanity: that of cowardice. You see, they know the dangers of sex and of bringing children into the world, but instead of controlling their women’s sexuality as all sane populations throughout history have done, they shrink from such responsibility and instead scuttle off to butchers in lab coats to ‘deal with the problem’ after the fact. How courageous. So noble.

This should be repugnant to any true man of the right. If you are unwilling to even fight the battle against the unleashed ‘bitches in heat’ that populate the West, we ought to laugh loudly at your determination for some kind of ethnic or religious conflict with other men in the future. Before anyone even speaks of ethnic minority abortions, note that in many of the home nations of these minorities, their men are fully in control. It is only when they arrive in Europe or North America that they shovel their kids out of the womb and into the garbage, and even then they still laughably outbreed the natives. While the ravings of Common Filth are hyperbolic and almost masochistic in their prose, they hold a kernel of truth about ‘white women’ in the contemporary era. But the thing is, it is not that ‘white women’ are particularly callous or cruel or even slutty. It’s that their men are pathetic, and unfortunately this was on display in our own circles just recently, with numerous participants.

altrightcontrov.png

Forgive me if I do not rush to Notre-Dame to enthrone Tomi Lahren because her feminist bile isn’t tarted up with blue hair and a nose ring, and it got her fired from a garbage media outlet. Forgive me if I think native Occidental populations don’t have a chance in hell of winning the ‘abortion war’ with ethnic minorities. Forgive me if my allegiance is to the Organic State, in which I can think of nothing more patently inorganic than a mother who murders her offspring. Oh wait, there is one thing; a man who calls it virtuous.

Advertisements

27 thoughts on “The Whore Enthroned

  1. Well, I would personally add that I think a lot of the problem is caused by the alt right being full of men thirsty for any sort of female attention, which means that awful female behavior might get a pass as long as some woman says some vaguely right wing things.

    I think in a lot of these kinds of cases men are weak to stand up to women because the focus of a lot of narratives in western life for the past hundred years or so has been that of romantic love being the pinnacle of emotional fulfillment, but collectively we seem to have forgotten all about the other kinds of love, which arguably could be a prerequisite for understanding eros and having a proper relationship with a woman.

    Like

  2. There’s so much here. I think the miscegenation problem could be fixed almost immediately if our men were strong. I currently live around some Pakistanis, even though they’re a minority, their girls never date outside the in-group. Meanwhile, the males date girls from the surrounding races (mostly Asian). We complain about these problems within our race, but then we never control our women. Valuable points.

    Like

  3. The responsibility lay with their Fathers, and they did nothing to raise their daughters properly because they themselves were not properly raised or suffered some moral corruption from the repeated droning of popular media. The “Daddy Issues” meme is talked about a fair amount & reinforced by a lot of young women.

    It’s no use telling men to “be stronger” when the unbiddable whore has all the societal power. Do not listen to wizened old THOTs crying out that they needed a stronger man when they were younger because, undoubtedly, they had one at one point in their lives and they simply rebelled against his authority. They likely equated into that previous relationship, and all others since, the current conception of “Love”, that everything is permissible and that anything to the contrary isn’t actually love but some sick attempt by the man to “control” you. Even worse they “thought they could do better” as many media outlets now lead them to believe.

    Ultimately the online right is a pot of simmering rage that has no deeper conception of the problems going on. The abortion question is completely off the table because “muh non white hordes”. These people want a society defined by practicable murder because they are too weak, or unthinking, to espouse anything else. They don’t even seem to prefer to advocate potentially achievable measures to offset this. Lowering taxes?No funding for contraceptives or abortion? Better marriage laws? Incentives for marriage and child rearing as a couple? Far too difficult. Better just let the womb whisking continue and hope that the Ubermensch emerge from the mangled mass.

    The idiocy continues when we start to look at females producing youtube videos with “right wing” content. Consider the youtuber “The White Rose”; she spouts utterly asinine talking points claiming to be “of the right” and she is a literal camwhore, and yet people still flock to her channel. Something like 12,000 subscribers. This pattern can be seen with any female youtuber. Obviously I’m not suggesting that they are all whores, although it is tempting, but their subscription count vs content produced leaves a lot to be desired. Reality Calls, who interviewed you recently, has a schizophrenic worldview when it comes to abortion. The analogy of mice sentience and early developmental foetus’, truly bizarre.

    Then we get to the truly pathetic MGTOW community, “disenfranchised” because they didn’t get enough sexual access to modern whores, but they are right for the wrong reasons. Ultimately many of these women are unfit for marriage, and quite frankly many men are unfit to be husbands and fathers. It would be better that they both just faded out without reproducing but until something is done to disincentivize this the cycle will continue. The male thirst will always be there to treat the THOT like a queen because ultimately many men do not wish to be alone, no matter how much they might have to degrade themselves to do so.

    I don’t think many men on the online-right really consider the possibility that the boomer idea of the nuclear family to be completely out of reach for them personally. Ultimately modern men on the right need to be made more aware that there is more to be achieved than the simple prize of a woman. Many greater men before them went without wives, or even sexual partners, why can’t they? This is probably the most difficult thing to drive home to them as the entire “white babies” and “womb war” memes have been drilled into them. An ironically dysgenic worldview from so many eugenics advocates. They need to realise, or be made to realise, they are the ones who are meant to lay the foundations for something greater, even if they do not live to see it themselves. If they refuse to accept or outright reject this idea then they are no better than the democratic hordes that bray back and forth from one politician to the next led by trinkets and false promises.

    Like

  4. The problem is that as long as abortion and divorce are easy options, people will not take true responsibility for their sexuality, their marriages or their offspring. The family is the basis of a healthy society and without it there is far less meaning and purpose to reproduction and relationships, other than increasing the general mass of dysfunctional westerners. These things are so simple and obvious that it takes layers of indoctrination and shoddy moral reasoning to obscure the truth. There’s no logical argument that can ultimately win the day here, the only answer that can connect the majority of people to these inherent truths is religion, although the church is currently being infected with POZ. Millennia of ancient wisdom and truth, all thrown out for “muh sexual freedom!” and “muh small government!”, sad.

    Liked by 1 person

  5. This article was SAVAGE. It also spoke to some issues which people don’t like to talk about, namely the thirsty dudes phenomenon, in which thirsty dudes will become fans of mediocre (at best) right wing women in a pathetic display of submission.

    More importantly though, it’s not merely a matter of men “controlling their women” (as in direct physical abuse which is bad) traditionally in Christian societies sexual control was achieved via the community (slut shaming) this was a powerful tool and was successful in keeping the majority of women in line. The problem is that, with the destruction of coherent communities via atomization there is no longer a community which is capable of doing the “slut shaming”. Combine this with the broader macro culture actually admonishing slutiness and you get Amerikwa.

    Liked by 2 people

      • In order to properly shame them it needs to happen as a cultural phenomenon. Us as individuals doing it is nothing and we’ll be ignored. The culture, the system, whatever one wishes to call it is the ultimate problem. It is neither the fault of the men not being strong. A strong man here and there is nothing in the big picture. As for thirstiness; who’s fault is that? The thirst is as natural as hunger, only the latter’s satiation is seen as a “human right.” If they are thirsty, us “strong men” who ‘know’ must quench that thirst. The question is gentlemen: are we “strong” enough to do that? Are we “strong” enough to reign them in? To make them marriageable? To quench the thirst of so many Vaisyas? (which is their right and our duty, unless you are too wholly into game/pua to think that way). I say we stop blaming the Vaisya for not knowing how to do what he can;t know how to do. They were only “strong” before because of the intellectual and moral aristocrats.

        Like

  6. Man is the One, Woman the Dyad — this is in Plato implicitly etc., recognized by some modern philosophers — I mean like Badiou, who said the very existence of Woman is a proof of atheism — who had a lackluster understanding of Platonism, being one of those modernists who is contented with starting at the end of the tradition to which they belong and staying there. This fact is a general association always in metaphysics. Aristotle says there are two first principles in Plato — the One and the indefinite Dyad, i.e. the One as it is in itself, and the One as it is to itself. Woman is “oppressed” because the total freedom of woman, the dislocation of woman from her essential relation to man and child, the casting out of woman from her natural orbit and revolutions, means the triumph of indefiniteness and chaos. The denial of the One always implies the thrusting of the woman to the fore in full licentiousness. The relatively derivative character of woman — she who is defined by birth and motherhood — is an offensive fact to those who forget God is called Father.

    Like

    • I should also say that, because the woman is essentially related to man, in wifehood, and child, in motherhood, abortion and divorce mean both mean: the death of womanhood. The murder of the child is the most symbolic act of suicide, in which the woman renounces herself, gives herself to nothing.

      Liked by 1 person

  7. Good article. I feel that it fails to address the “real politic” of the subject. The blaze network and others like it need to be completely destroyed, along with the “adopt an African baby” pro life movement in the United States. These organizations promote weakness in White men, the very weakness you are cursing.

    If this Tomi could be used as a blunt tool to further their demise, so be it. I am not even comfortable calling myself “pro life” anymore, I am simply pro White family.

    Like

    • Why would you devote any attention, much less compromise a key rightist principle, to undermine something of no relevance (the Blaze). The people who engage with the Blaze are of no value to the right wing agenda, and they are certainly not of enough influence to be worth actively destroying. Also it is unclear how shining Lahren’s tits undermined the Blaze or those virtue-signalling families. What is the mechanism of influence there? I don’t think you’ve even thought this through.

      You’re seeing some kind of “clever plan” in motion, when what is actually happening is, just like with Evalion, pleb-tier rightists are drawn into clownish antics because they drool over and idolize mentally handicapped whores.

      Liked by 1 person

      • I am a little disturbed at the number of people on “the right” that accuse any discussion about this topic being nothing other than admiration of Tomi’s tits.

        Listen, if you want to write off ‘The Blaze’ as having no relevance, fine, do that. However, if you are not willing to appreciate the fact that many in the Alt Right have people close to us that are influenced by organizations like that, than you are being willfully ignorant. Glenn beck is on the radio in my area every day from 9 to 12. I would adamantly argue against their audience being of no use, considering I personally know people within that audience. Many of them, if refocused on what is politically important, instead of garbage bumper sticker phrase politics, could be quite useful to us. This is not a lost cause, how does every think Trump got elected?

        If you want to accuse people like me of making this personal I would understand that. Politics is personal as far as I a concerned.

        Like

        • The phenomenon of people on the AltRight pedestalling ‘redpill women’ is not something I was the first to talk about, but has been something of a habit for a while, beginning with Evalion. If you think that isn’t the case here with Lahren, then you have to explain the sycophantic response to her statements not being present when the same sentiments are expressed by your average college feminist. Verbatim, they use the same talking point.

          Glenn Beck was a vociferous ‘NeverTrump’ voice who accused his supporters of being “Brownshirts”. Those still listening to him would not be Trump voters, in the same way readers of the Weekly Standard wouldn’t be.

          But you’ve failed to address my point. What mechanism has discredited the Blaze here? Do you think your Blaze-listening friends (who are probably ‘pro-life’) have listened to Tomi Lahren’s feminism and then thought “gee, I’m a white nationalist now!” How does that even make sense? There is a disconnect here between what you think is vaguely happening, and the fact that is has no mechanism to actually happen. Unless somebody is listening to the Blaze because they LOVE Tomi Lahren, then her leaving is unlikely to change their minds on it. And EVEN if that did happen, it would have no racial aspect because Lahren does not use race in her argument for abortion.

          Liked by 1 person

          • Listen, I hear you. The problem is, is that men are attracted to young good looking women. Why do you think Tomi was apart of the Blaze in the first place? How do you fight this? Well, we need to reinstall the patriarchy, remove all civil rights laws, and remove political rights from women. Men need to value themselves and their people more than “cummies”. That is the obvious long term goal, and I am serious about this. But that isn’t going to happen tomorrow.

            That being said, I am talking about destroying the Blaze entirely. It is teetering on the brink of insolvency. Tomi brought eyeballs, which brought advertising dollars. She was fired, so the wedge driving worked. You always fight to divide your enemy as much as possible. The Blaze is nothing but kosher, controlled opposition. Not having Tomi generating revenue for them is good, as well as the fact that this type of chaos has generally worked in “our” favor.

            Like

      • Not to mention, as a Christian I am surprised that you are not more interested in groups that have basically coopted Christianity in ‘the West’, sold it to Zionists, and turned churches into cuck factories.

        Like

        • What does ‘interested’ mean in this context? I agree with you that these kinds of outlets do need to die, but I come back to my central point, NOTHING you are doing is discrediting the Blaze, so it is utterly pointless. Here is where logic can help.

          1) Tomi Lahren is fired for supporting abortion, using completely non-racial related arguments.
          2) White nationalists support Tomi Lahren against her former employer
          3) Listeners to the Blaze become white nationalists, and stop listening

          You see how 2 and 3 have no logical connection. In fact the only connection in this entire train of thought is idiot white nationalists thinking abortion is good, which was exactly what I was refuting in this article.

          Listen, you’re trying to have a good-faith conversation and I respect that, but you’re pettifogging the issue at hand. You need to show me two things:

          1) You need to show me where I’m wrong on abortion’s relationship with feminism, in which case we can all give praise to St. Tomi and crown her with some infant entrails.

          2) You need to show me how this is a clever tactical ploy that will hurt the Blaze somehow, with a core audience that is pro-life.

          Until those things are done, my central argument stands.

          Like

          • You are not wrong on the abortion issue being tied to feminism. Tomi promotes abortion and Glenn Beck promotes Zionist wars and adopting African babies… lol, there is no “good side” in this spat. Tomi brings wealth and traffic to The Blaze. Her departure hurt them.

            I am not defending “Tomi”, or her stances, I am using her as a tool. This is a divide in the cuck right. We can talk about how horrible Tomi is, but Glenn Beck and The Blaze is far worse as far as I concerned. Is that subjective, sure, but like I said, Glenn Beck has the media empire and is on my radio every day, 9-12, spewing his garbage. When two individuals who are leading your people astray, and that includes both Whites and Christians, are fighting, you do your best to throw gasoline on the fire.

            Not sure how you are not able to see this.

            Like

            • From that standpoint, I understand the cynical nature of what you’re doing, I just don’t honestly think it’s worth the degradation of white knighting for Lahren. Case in point: Milo was disinvited from CPAC recently for advocating teen boy molestation. Presumably because CPAC is full of cucks we should have piled on and justified what he said just to “throw gasoline on the fire”. Or, do what most people did, point out why Milo was a scumbag and not really care about the dumpster fire.

              Like

  8. This is a superb essay. I have just 2 comments. First, I think guys worship so-called conservative women like Tomi because there is a lack of “conservative” women. We are so far left that an attractive woman who supports abortion and, yet claims to be conservative somehow means something. And what Andrew M said, many guys on the altright are just thirsty.

    For some reason, far too many white nationalists believe that if we just get rid of non-white people, the problems plaguing the west will be solved. Nevermind the fact that these problems all find their roots in a time when the West was extremely white.

    Liked by 1 person

  9. Pingback: This Week In Reaction (2017/04/02) - Social Matter

  10. Pingback: The Very Best of Last Week in Reaction (2017/04/02) – The Reactivity Place

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s