A brief interlude to discuss three topics that do not require a full length article to delve into. The second part of ‘Gazing Into the Age of Kali’ is upcoming probably late next week.
Firstly, His Holiness Patriarch Kirill of Moscow and all Rus’ has condemned the Eurovision Song Contest in the official statement of the church, declaring it “repulsive” on the back of what was most certainly an engineered victory handed to Austrian tranny, Thomas Neuwirth. Declaring the continued degeneracy of the competition to be “repulsive to our soul and our culture,” His Holiness the Patriarch puts voice to the opinions of the Orthodox faithful, including your humble correspondent. It is a shame that we have not heard such unequivocal condemnation from the Catholic Church of the current referendum in Ireland which has legalized perversion of marriage in that historically Catholic country by popular vote, with a large number of clergy openly supporting the measure. This kind of heresy cannot be left unchecked, for it is the destroyer of souls.
After uncertainty about who owned the NeoReactionary brand since a rash of argument, doxxing, and excommuncation, it would appear that the quixotic intellectual movement has fallen directly under the governance of the Hestia Society for Social Studies, the root organization controlling the Social Matter website, a friend to this blog. This putsch, while I cannot swear fealty to it since I operate outside of NeoReaction, has my good wishes going forward with the hope that the ‘Dark Enlightenment’ can continue providing good commentary on our decaying civilization, and solutions to the problems that the radical right faces with a look towards the future.
The final point I want to address concerns commenters in the Reactosphere. I have tackled this topic briefly before when reflecting on how the Reactosphere should ideally operate, but I wanted to elaborate.
Occasionally, flunkies for leftism wander over to this dark and uncharted corner of the net to essentially spout off their talking points. These include but are not limited to both ardent Liberals and more often self-declared Libertarians, as well as trolls who might take issue with the ‘tone’ of the radical right, and stand aghast at how politically incorrect what they are reading is. It’s fair to say every operator of any blog has the authority to police their comments as they see fit. Some prefer a wide open debate, others prefer more control to weed out the viewpoints that are toxic sludge (i.e – supporting perversion or attacking the Faith). On this blog at least, I won’t be ‘tolerant’ of liberals at all. If a Conservative who is genuinely seeking to understand the real right wing wants to engage, then we can have a discussion. However, if you are a leftist hell bent on promoting your own anti-Traditional ideology, you can take your pablum elsewhere. This is the policy I recommend for every Reactosphere blogger, because often times such people will provoke a derailing of a given discussion into needless sidetracks which are just not even debatable points on the radical right.
I think it was Bonald who said something to the effect of, “I’m a monarchist, and since this is my blog, I’m the absolute monarch of the comment section. Don’t like it, go somewhere else.”